“Irrationally held truths may be more harmful than reasoned errors.”
-Thomas Huxley
Workers invest in education, certiifications, committment to work for a venture. What sorts of risks do the workers assume? If the venture fails or the industry experinces disruptive innovation, the workers assume the risk resulting from their investment in traing education that might become redundant overnight, committment that might become a liability, assume the consequences of assuming loans necessary to have a livelihood; house car loan, eduactional loans?
Workers’ committments to work for an industry or venture have risks.
Do workers’ risks merit less privilege in the allocation of tax burden?
Where did the talking point about the fairness or unfairness of tax one burden to another one come from?ENVY?
Is that not an impulsive deligitimation and trivalization of genuine concerns?
Where did the criterium that one risk merits a lower tax burden than another come from?
Who was the arbiter to decide that criteria and over what competing criteria?
Are ther objective non-arbitary justifications for the inequalities?
Disclosure: NO you can’t contact this blog. No you can’t find out the ownership of this blog! Never, you can’t shut down the power of this blog!!
Tags: Innovation, Regulations, Idiocy, stupidity, Racism, Candian Government Apartheid, Human Rights, Slavery, Black people oppression, Apartheid, Intellectual prostitution, faith-based pimping and prostitution, AIG Bonus, MIB, Self-defeating, Self-destruction, booty call, Booty Traps, Jezebels, bastard sons and daughters of the devil and his demons, true-believer, terrorism, Newscorp, Race profiling, Law and order, Race-bad terrorism
